Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Feferman proved that, on a certain reconstruction, the pr... — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Predicativist analysis is a conservative extension of Peano Arithmetic

    Feferman proved that, on a certain reconstruction, the predicativist theory does not prove any new arithmetical statements beyond those provable in Peano Arithmetic

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked
    Predicativist analysis is a conservative extension of Peano Arithmetic

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Feferman gave a detailed formal presentation of predicativist analysisPredicativist analysis is a conservative extension of Peano Arithmetic

    Similar

    Gödel showed that arithmetical theories capable of expressing syntax, ...77%Gödel and Cohen demonstrated the mathematical incompleteness of ZFC se...74%Arithmetic theories such as Peano Arithmetic can express mathematicall...73%If G_F were provable in F, that would contradict Gödel's first incompl...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: infinity
    View source passageHide passage
    An intermediate position is that defended by classical “predicativists” such as Poincaré and Weyl. The theory, presented in a satisfactory logical way by Feferman and others, accepts the excluded middle on the natural numbers (and as such it is arguably committed to the existence of the set of natural numbers and in any case to accepting bivalence on the natural numbers) but does not accept the existence of the power set of the natural numbers. According to predicativism (see Feferman 2005), set

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective