Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Field (1972) showed that Tarski's definition fails to red... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Deflationism faces a dilemma: it is either false or trivial.

    Field (1972) showed that Tarski's definition fails to reduce semantic notions to physical ones, exposing that deflationism inherits this explanatory gap regardless of which horn it chooses.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Field (1972)(as a reference to a specific philosophical argument)
    Hartry Field, a philosopher who wrote an important 1972 paper arguing that a famous theory about how language works couldn't actually explain what it claimed to explain.
    Reduce (or reduction)(as an explanatory goal)
    To explain something complicated by breaking it down into simpler, more basic parts—like explaining how a car works by describing its engine, wheels, and fuel system.
    Semantic notions(as concepts that the theory tried to explain)
    Ideas about meaning and truth—things related to what words and sentences actually mean and whether they're true or false.
    Tarski's definition(as the theory being criticized)
    A theory by logician Alfred Tarski about what it means for a statement to be 'true'—basically, he tried to explain truth in very precise, scientific terms.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Which horn it chooses(as a metaphor for deflationism's unavoidable problems)
    When a difficult problem seems to have multiple ways to solve it, but each solution has its own problems—each option is called a 'horn,' and this phrase means no matter which option you pick, you still have a flaw.
    deflationism(The position under critical scrutiny in this passage)
    A view about truth (implied by context) under which certain explanatory claims, such as (6), are equivalent to trivially self-referential claims like (8).
    explanatory gap(Central concept in anti-physicalist arguments)
    The alleged in-principle inability to intelligibly explain how consciousness arises from physical processes
    physical(Feigl's identity theory)
    Neural processes

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Deflationism faces a dilemma: it is either false or trivial.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective