Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Fine's supervaluationist framework generates 'higher-orde... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Rejecting the induction step of the sorites paradox does not dissolve the paradox but merely transforms it into a different problem.

    Fine's supervaluationist framework generates 'higher-order vagueness': vagueness about which precisifications are admissible reintroduces a structurally identical sorites at the metalinguistic level.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Admissible(as used in formal logic)
    Allowed or acceptable according to the rules of the system being discussed.
    Fine, Kit(The statement references Fine's framework as the basis for the argument)
    A contemporary philosopher known for developing supervaluationism, a theory about how language handles vague or fuzzy concepts.
    Metalinguistic(as describing facts about language)
    Having to do with language itself rather than what language describes—it's about the properties of words and sentences, not the world.
    Precisifications(as used in logic)
    Different ways of making a fuzzy or vague concept exact and clear by drawing specific boundaries.
    Sorites(Classical logic and Hellenistic philosophy)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    A form of argument (also called the 'heap argument') that proceeds by small incremental steps to show that no precise boundary exists between two states, thereby challenging the applicability of vague predicates
    higher-order vagueness(in philosophy of language)
    When you try to fix a vague boundary by drawing a precise line, but then you face the same vagueness problem all over again—the new line itself becomes unclear why it's the right one.
    supervaluationism(Presented as a counter to the Fregean defect view of vagueness)
    A theory of vagueness on which semantic indecision is intentional and functional: speakers fill in the meanings of terms incrementally in light of new information and interests rather than fixing full definitions prematurely.
    vagueness(Example: 'materially adverse change' in In re Carter's Claim (1957))
    Imprecision in terms whose application admits of borderline cases.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Rejecting the induction step of the sorites paradox does not dissolve the parado...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective