Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Finite objects are mathematically unproblematic — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Finite objects are mathematically unproblematic

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Finite objects such as stroke configurations corresponding to natural numbers and finite sentences of a formal language can be grasped individually
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Objects that can be grasped individually can also be grasped in their potential totality
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Objects graspable in their potential totality do not give rise to consistency problems
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Finite objects such as stroke configurations corresponding to natural numbers an...Objects graspable in their potential totality do not give rise to consistency pr...Objects that can be grasped individually can also be grasped in their potential ...

    Similar

    Infinite objects are mathematically problematic86%Mental objects cannot account for infinitely many mathematical objects...80%Intuitionism only accepts the existence of mathematical objects whose ...78%Infinite mathematical objects, such as the completed set of all natura...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: infinity
    View source passageHide passage
    Another viewpoint, associated with David Hilbert, is called finitism (see Hilbert 1926). Most finitists accept classical logic, but worry about the consistency of theories of infinite objects. Hilbert’s worries about consistency were fueled by the paradoxes that the new infinitary set-theoretic mathematics was giving rise to (Cantor’s inconsistent sets; Burali-Forti Paradox; Russell’s paradox etc.) Hilbert was convinced that quantification over such infinite totalities was at the root of the tro
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit