Skip to content

Topics Thinkers Changes ContributorsLoading account…

Carmelics

A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

Navigate

Topics
Search
Recent Changes
Contribute
How It Works
Glossary
Thinkers
Contributors
About
Statistics
Terms
Privacy

Database

Statements: —
Perspectives: —
Topics: —

Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

Made within

DC&

Austin

Statements: 321,452
Perspectives: 108,905
Topics: 42

Fitch's proof requires explosion (ex contradictione quodl... — Carmelics

History Edit See Inverse

Part of a larger discussion

Supports→Fitch's knowability argument does not straightforwardly apply to paraconsistent logics

Fitch's proof requires explosion (ex contradictione quodlibet) to derive that omniscience follows from knowability, but LP explicitly blocks explosion as a valid inference.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

Connections

2 topics

Truth & Knowledge1 linked Modality & Possibility1 linked

Related

Fitch's knowability argument does not straightforwardly apply to paraconsistent ...

Next step

Based on where you are in your exploration

Explore a random proposition

Start fresh with something unrelated.

Details

Type: claim
Perspectives: 0 (0 for, 0 against)
Edits: 1 edit

Open for perspectives

This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

Share the first perspective