Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Fock (1926) and London (1927) suggested that this new qua... — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Weyl abandoned his 1918 gauge theory around 1927/28 because quantum mechanics provided a superior account of electric charge conservation.

    Fock (1926) and London (1927) suggested that this new quantum-mechanical gauge invariance more adequately accounted for the conservation of electric charge than Weyl's 1918 gauge theory did.

    All sources support itTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeAll sources support it

    Key Terms

    Conservation of electric charge(as used in physics)
    The principle that the total amount of electric charge in a closed system stays the same—it can't be created or destroyed, only moved around.
    Fock (1926) and London (1927)(as historical references in physics)
    Vladimir Fock and Fritz London were physicists who independently developed improved versions of gauge theory around the same time to better explain electric charge.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Gauge invariance(the main structural principle being vindicated)
    A mathematical principle saying that certain equations describing physical forces stay true even when you change your perspective or measurement scale—like how the laws of physics don't change if you measure from a different location.
    Quantum mechanics(the scientific framework being discussed)
    The science of how the tiniest things in the universe (atoms, electrons, photons) behave—which turns out to work very differently than everyday objects.
    Weyl's 1918 gauge theory(as a historical reference in physics)
    An early mathematical framework created by physicist Hermann Weyl that tried to explain how electric and magnetic forces work using the concept of gauge invariance.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation2 linked

    Related

    The quantum theory of the electron, developed around 1927/28, introduced a diffe...Weyl abandoned his 1918 gauge theory around 1927/28 because quantum mechanics pr...

    Similar

    Weyl abandoned his 1918 gauge theory around 1927/28 because quantum me...86%The quantum theory of the electron, developed around 1927/28, introduc...84%Weyl's gauge invariant interpretation of electromagnetism lacked a com...75%Einstein, Pauli, and others mounted a preponderance of compelling empi...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: weyl
    View source passageHide passage
    With the advent of the quantum theory of the electron around 1927/28 Weyl abandoned his gauge theory of 1918. He did so because in the new quantum theory a different kind of gauge invariance associated with Dirac’s theory of the electron was discovered which, as had been suggested by Fock (1926) and London (1927), more adequately accounted for the conservation of electric charge.[92] Why did Weyl hold on to his gauge theory for almost a decade despite a preponderance of compelling empiric

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective