Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that For altruism to evolve, recipients of altruistic actions must have a greater than average probability of being altruists themselves.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Kin selection (Hamilton 1964) shows altruism can evolve when recipients share genes by common descent, not by behavioral correlation among non-kin.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim conflates population-level statistical frequency with the distinct genetic relatedness coefficient (r) that actually drives inclusive fitness calculations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Multilevel selection theory (Sober & Wilson 1998) demonstrates that altruism can evolve when altruist-dense groups outcompete defector-dense groups, regardless of within-group recipient identity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If between-group selection pressure is sufficiently strong, altruistic traits spread even when individual recipients are no more likely than average to be altruists themselves.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Altruism evolving requires that altruists and recipients both carry copies of the altruistic gene.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A greater than average probability of recipients being altruists ensures the shared-gene condition is met.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.