Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    For any sentence φ that characterizes a structure M up to... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Infinite structures cannot be fully characterized by deductive means in second-order logic

    For any sentence φ that characterizes a structure M up to isomorphism, the class of Henkin models Mod_H(φ) contains models other than M itself in all non-trivial cases

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Deductions in second-order logic cannot distinguish the intended model M from it...Formal systems have inherent weakness, traceable to Skolem and Gödel, that preve...Infinite structures cannot be fully characterized by deductive means in second-o...

    Similar

    Any second-order sentence that characterizes a structure up to isomorp...89%A structure isomorphic to models of NFU can be constructed in the isom...84%The models of ZFC^2 are, up to isomorphism, of the form (V_kappa, epsi...80%Carnap's conjecture restricted to countable models—that any two counta...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-higher-order
    View source passageHide passage
    Obviously, \(\Mod(\phi)\subseteq \textit{Mod}_H(\phi)\). If \(\phi\) characterizes \(\mm\) up to isomorphism, then \(\mm\in \Mod(\phi) \). In all non-trivial cases[16] \(\textit{Mod}_H(\phi)\ne \{\mm\}\). We can think of \(\textit{Mod}_H(\phi)\) as a class of “approximations” of \(\mm\). One of the approximations is the “real” \(\mm\) but by means of deductions in second-order logic we cannot tell which. Because of the inherent weakness of formal systems, going back to Skolem and Gödel, infini

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective