Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    For explanatory analogies and mathematical analogies, the... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Norton's material theory of analogical reasoning fails to provide useful evaluation criteria for most analogical arguments.

    For explanatory analogies and mathematical analogies, the uniformity is itself the target of the inference rather than a given driver, so the theory does not apply.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    For many other analogical arguments, the underlying uniformity is unclear, leavi...Norton's material theory of analogical reasoning fails to provide useful evaluat...Norton's theory works only when the local uniformity (the fact of the analogy) i...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    For many other analogical arguments, the underlying uniformity is uncl...88%Norton's theory works only when the local uniformity (the fact of the ...83%Greater systematicity is not sufficient for a more plausible analogica...81%Inductive inferences rely on the principle of the uniformity of nature80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: reasoning-analogy
    View source passageHide passage
    Orderly structures emerge out of random low-level processes and the program produces plausible solutions. Copycat thus shows that analogy-making can be modeled as a process akin to perception, even if the program employs mechanisms distinct from those in human perception. The multiconstraint theory and Copycat share the idea that analogical cognition involves cognitive processes that operate below the level of abstract reasoning. Both computational models—to the extent that they are capable of

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective