Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that For Pure Land teaching to be authentically grasped, a shift or transformation of awareness must emerge in beings
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Shinran's own doctrine of tariki (other-power) explicitly rejects self-cultivated transformation as a precondition for salvific understanding.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If Amida's vow operates unconditionally regardless of the practitioner's mental state, requiring an antecedent shift contradicts the soteriological structure of Pure Land itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations establish that authentic grasp of a teaching is demonstrated through correct application, not through privileged inner states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A criterion of authentic understanding that appeals to ineffable shifts of awareness is epistemically inaccessible and cannot serve as a meaningful standard of doctrinal comprehension.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Human understanding is constantly subject to the distortions of self-attachment
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Authentic grasp of the teaching requires overcoming the distortions of ordinary awareness
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.