Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Forgiveness requires the wronged party to voluntarily rel... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If forgiveness and excuse both achieve the same moral psychological endpoint—the relinquishment of resentment—their conceptual distinctness reduces to a difference of degree, not kind.

    Forgiveness requires the wronged party to voluntarily release justified resentment; excusing requires recognizing the wrongdoer lacked moral responsibility. These are categorically different.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Categorically different(arguing that weak dominance is not a weaker version of strong dominance, but something entirely separate)
    Fundamentally different in kind or type, rather than just different in degree or strength—like how a dog differs from a rock, not just like how a large dog differs from a small one.
    Excusing(as used in ethics)
    Accepting that someone shouldn't be blamed for what they did because they couldn't help it or didn't fully understand what they were doing.
    Forgiveness(as used in ethics)
    The act of letting go of anger or resentment toward someone who has hurt you, and choosing not to hold their wrongdoing against them anymore.
    Justified resentment(as used in ethics)
    Anger or bitterness that is reasonable and warranted because someone genuinely did something wrong to you.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Voluntarily(as used in discussions of free will and responsibility)
    By your own free choice, without being forced or compelled by something outside yourself.
    Wronged party(as used in ethics)
    The person who was harmed or treated unfairly by someone else's actions.
    moral responsibility(The author argues for a pluralistic understanding rather than a Kantian-exclusive one)
    A normative concept whose scope is contested; the passage implies it encompasses at least Kantian notions (centered on individual rational agency) and other notions (potentially sociological, collective, or non-individualist in character)
    resentment(Proposed within the no-priority view discussion of wrongness)
    A specific form of anger conceptually restricted to cases that are founded on moral reasons, particularly wrongness.
    wrongdoer(as used in ethics)
    A person who has done something morally or legally wrong; someone who has committed an offense or harmful act.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    If forgiveness and excuse both achieve the same moral psychological endpoint—the...

    Related

    If forgiveness and excuse both achieve the same moral psychological endpoint—the...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective