Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Forgiving is accomplished only when one successfully goes through both stages.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Jeffrie Murphy argues forgiveness is fundamentally an alteration of resentment alone, requiring no separate cognitive reassessment of the wrongdoer's character.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Collapsing emotional and cognitive stages into a single affective shift better explains cases where forgiveness feels sudden and complete without deliberate reappraisal.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Charles Griswold's account holds that forgiveness can be partial and graduated, meaning binary stage-completion misrepresents its essentially processual and revisable nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If forgiveness admits of degrees rather than discrete stages, then demanding completion of both stages sets an artificially high threshold that excludes paradigm cases of genuine forgiveness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Forgiveness requires a change in emotion towards the wrongdoer.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Forgiveness requires an intentional alteration of one's assessments about the wrongdoer as a person.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.