Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Foucault's counter-argument targets only the empirical-ps... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Cartesian move from 'I think' to 'I am' is no longer available to modern thought.

    Foucault's counter-argument targets only the empirical-psychological reading of the cogito, leaving the transcendental version, defended by Husserl and Sartre, largely untouched.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Foucault's critique in The Order of Things targets the cogito as empirical foundation for knowledge, not transcendental conditions of possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Husserl and Sartre explicitly bracket empirical psychology to defend the cogito as transcendental, making them logically distinct targets.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Foucault's own genealogical method presupposes some form of transcendental structure, suggesting he accepts rather than refutes it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The empirical-transcendental distinction itself becomes unstable once Foucault historicizes the subject; no clean separation survives his critique.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Sartre's transcendental cogito depends on intentional consciousness as lived experience, collapsing the empirical-transcendental boundary Foucault exploits.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If the cogito is constituted historically, even its transcendental claim to necessity becomes contingent—Foucault's position undermines transcendental immunity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Foucault's critique in The Order of Things targets the cogito as empirical found...Foucault's own genealogical method presupposes some form of transcendental struc...Husserl and Sartre explicitly bracket empirical psychology to defend the cogito ...If the cogito is constituted historically, even its transcendental claim to nece...
    +3 moreShow less
    Sartre's transcendental cogito depends on intentional consciousness as lived exp...The Cartesian move from 'I think' to 'I am' is no longer available to modern tho...The empirical-transcendental distinction itself becomes unstable once Foucault h...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit