Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Frankfurt's work on free will shows that agents can be compelled by external conditions without this nullifying the authenticity of their resulting choices.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If external conditions fully determine which desires an agent endorses, the endorsement itself loses independent agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Distinguishing 'true self' (second-order desires) from 'false self' (first-order) is metaphysically dubious without principled criteria.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Compelled choices systematically undermine the control necessary for moral responsibility, regardless of internal consistency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Authenticity requires alignment between action and an agent's true desires, not absence of external influence on those desires.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Frankfurt's hierarchical model shows agents can endorse their first-order desires reflectively, making them genuinely their own.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
All desire formation involves prior causal conditions; rejecting this would make any desire inauthentic, collapsing the concept.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.