Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Free creatures are an enhancement to creation despite their actions not escaping providence.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
If God's providence cannot be escaped, creaturely freedom is compatibilist at best, undermining the 'enhancement' claim's reliance on genuine libertarian agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Compatibilist freedom does not meaningfully mirror divine freedom, collapsing the analogy in P1 of the supporting argument.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The magnitude of evil produced by free creatures—including radical evil like genocide—provides strong prima facie evidence against any net enhancement to creation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Dostoevsky's Ivan Karamazov argument holds that no eschatological fellowship can retrospectively justify the suffering of innocents caused by creaturely freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The nature of free creatures reflects more closely what we suppose to be God's own nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Free creatures are more suited to the kind of fellowship with God that believers understand to be their ultimate destiny.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.