Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Free-standing instances of the variables 'p' and 'q' cann... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The expressions (4.1*)–(4.3*) cannot be English counterparts of English sentences

    Free-standing instances of the variables 'p' and 'q' cannot fill the argument-slots of truth-functions such as conjunction and material implication, which require complete sentences as arguments

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Material implication(as the traditional interpretation of implication)
    A simple way of understanding 'if A then B' that only cares about whether the statements are true or false, not about any real connection between them.
    argument-slots(formal logic)
    The positions in a logical argument where you can plug in statements or values—like the blank spaces in a fill-in-the-blank question.
    complete sentences

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (in formal logic)
    Statements that express a full thought and can be judged as either true or false—not just fragments or isolated words.
    conjunction(Argument about atomic parthood via directional contact)
    The coming together or contact of atoms from different directions, used to test whether atoms have spatial parts.
    truth-functions(in formal logic)
    Logical operations (like 'and' or 'if-then') that take statements as input and produce a true or false output based on whether the input statements are true or false.
    variables (p and q)(in formal logic)
    Placeholder letters used in logic that stand in for any statement or sentence—think of them like blank slots you can fill with different claims.

    Related

    Free-standing uses of 'p' and 'q' in 'and p' and 'then q' lack a verb, and there...The expressions (4.1*)–(4.3*) are not well-formedThe expressions (4.1*)–(4.3*) cannot be English counterparts of English sentence...

    Similar

    The propositional variables 'p' and 'q' have sentential status and can...86%Free-standing uses of 'p' and 'q' in 'and p' and 'then q' lack a verb,...80%The variables 'p' and 'q' express a truth-bearer78%If sentences denote truth values, sentences cannot denote propositions...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ramsey
    View source passageHide passage
    Ramsey (1929c, [OT] 9) anticipated a possible reaction to his use of propositional variables and to the translation of (4.1)–(4.3) as (4.1*)–(4.3*). The objection is the following: (4.1*)–(4.3*) cannot be English* counterparts of English sentences because they are not well-formed. Free-standing instances, the objection goes, of the variables ‘p’ and ‘q’ cannot fill the argument-slots of truth-functions, such as conjunction and material implication, which need complete sentences as arguments. F

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective