Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Free will requires the capacity for genuine rational deliberation, which is undermined by persistent cognitive distortion or illusion.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
All cognition involves some distortion; requiring perfect accuracy sets an impossible standard that eliminates free will entirely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
People with cognitive distortions still deliberate, weigh reasons, and act on their values—these capacities define free will regardless.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Identifying a distortion proves the agent can recognize it; this metacognitive capacity itself enables genuine deliberation and choice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Rational deliberation requires accurate perception of options and consequences; cognitive distortions systematically misrepresent reality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
When illusions govern choices, decisions reflect the distortion rather than the agent's authentic values or reasoning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Free will demands the ability to revise beliefs through evidence; persistent distortions block this corrective mechanism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.