Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Frege's concept-object distinction shows predication is not a symmetric 'link' but an asymmetric saturation of an unsaturated function by an argument.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Natural language subjects and predicates are interchangeable: 'Red is exemplified by roses' reverses roles without logical loss.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The concept-object distinction conflates grammatical structure with logical form; predicates can be truth-functionally symmetric.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Relational predicates like 'equals' show mutual saturation—neither argument has logical priority—undermining inherent asymmetry claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Predicates linguistically require objects to complete them ('___ is red'), while objects don't require predicates, showing asymmetry.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Functions in mathematics are fundamentally unsaturated (f(x) is incomplete until x is provided), and predicates behave identically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Symmetric relations like 'is beside' still decompose into directional functional slots, preserving asymmetry at the logical level.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.