Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Frege's treatment of quantified propositions departs radi... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The grammatical structure of a sentence does not reflect the logical structure of the proposition it expresses

    Frege's treatment of quantified propositions departs radically from the traditional view that grammatical structure mirrors logical structure

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    Active and passive sentences expressing the same proposition have different gram...The grammatical structure of a sentence does not reflect the logical structure o...

    Similar

    Traditional grammar masks the true logical structure of quantified pro...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    91%
    The grammatical structure of a sentence does not reflect the logical s...83%
    Restricted quantifiers allow logical paraphrases that closely parallel...82%
    Choosing the unrestricted quantifier regimentation does not show that ...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logical-form
    View source passageHide passage
    On Frege’s view, the proposition that Mary sang has a functional component corresponding to ‘sang’ and an argument corresponding to ‘Mary’, even if the English sentence ‘Mary sang’ has ‘Mary’ as its subject and ‘sang’ as its predicate. The proposition can be represented as follows: \(\textrm{Sang}(\textrm{Mary})\). Frege thought of the relevant function as a conditional mapping from individuals to truth values: \(\textrm{Sang}(x) = \textbf{T}\) if \(x\) sang, and \(\textbf{F}\) otherwise; where

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective