Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that G.E. Moore's ideal utilitarianism holds that beauty, knowledge, and friendship have intrinsic value independent of the pleasure they produce.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Without conscious experience, claims about intrinsic value become metaphysically mysterious and unverifiable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Our preferences for beauty, knowledge, and friendship evolved because they reliably produced fitness benefits, undermining intrinsic value claims.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moore cannot explain why we should care about intrinsic values without appealing to their ultimate connection to well-being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
We value knowledge even when it causes suffering, suggesting value beyond pleasure production.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A world with beautiful art but no observers has value, indicating intrinsic rather than experiential value.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Friendship's worth persists even when it generates anxiety or hardship, not reducible to net pleasure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.