Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Geach's relative identity thesis holds that identity statements are only well-formed relative to a sortal, so 'a = b' simpliciter is not a coherent identity claim.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Mathematics assumes unconditional identity: '2 + 2 = 4' requires no sortal context, yet remains coherent and fundamental to logic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Sortal relativization creates regress: if 'a = b as Fs' is true, we need sortal-free identity to explain what makes this statement itself true.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Identity is a logical primitive, not dependent on descriptive content; sortals are epistemically useful but metaphysically unnecessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Identity judgments in natural language require sortal context: 'the morning star is the evening star' requires knowing we're comparing celestial bodies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz's Law fails without sortals: objects can share some properties but differ on sortal-dependent ones (same person, different human/artist).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Bare 'a = b' cannot determine whether we're asking about numerical, qualitative, or conventional identity without specifying a criterion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.