Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that General conclusions in aesthetics should be reached only from close examination of examples of art and of our responses to them.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Kant argues that aesthetic judgments claim universal assent yet cannot be grounded in empirical examples, which are always particular and contingent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Inductive examination of artworks cannot yield the a priori principles that ground the normativity aesthetics requires.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Hegel's Lectures on Aesthetics demonstrate that the philosophy of art requires a prior conceptual framework—the dialectic of Spirit—to determine which examples are even aesthetically relevant.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without theoretical criteria, the selection of 'close examples' is arbitrary and cannot generate genuinely general conclusions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Herder's own method derives general conclusions from particular examples rather than from prior definitions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Herder's most important aesthetic claims are grounded in detailed engagement with specific works, such as those of Ossian and Shakespeare.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.