Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Gentzen's first consistency proof aims to show that any p... — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A proof of a sequent in first-order arithmetic gives rise to a well-founded reduction tree

    Gentzen's first consistency proof aims to show that any proof of a sequent in first-order arithmetic produces a reduction tree

    Proof of definition segmentsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeProof of definition segments

    Related

    A proof of a sequent in first-order arithmetic gives rise to a well-founded redu...That reduction tree can be identified with a cut-free proof in the sequent calcu...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A proof of a sequent in first-order arithmetic gives rise to a well-fo...89%That reduction tree can be identified with a cut-free proof in the seq...77%NFSI's consistency has been proved by Tupailo77%Interpretability is helpful for proving consistency, as T' is proved c...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: proof-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    Gentzen did not deal explicitly with infinite proof trees in his second published proof of the consistency of PA (Gentzen 1938b). However, in the unpublished first consistency proof of Gentzen 1974 he aims at showing that a proof of a sequent in first-order arithmetic gives rise to a a well-founded reduction tree; that tree can be identified with a cut-free proof in the sequent calculus with the \(\omega\)-rule. The infinitary version of PA with the \(\omega\)-rule was investigated by Schütte (1

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective