Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Genuine freedom of will requires the ability to do otherwise under identical circumstances, as defended by libertarians from Reid to van Inwagen.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The ability to do otherwise under identical circumstances is metaphysically incoherent—identity includes all causally relevant factors.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Compatibilists show that moral responsibility aligns with determinism if freedom means acting on one's own desires/reasoning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If libertarian free will requires uncaused choices, those choices seem random rather than free, undermining the original intuition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral responsibility requires that an agent could have chosen differently; otherwise praise/blame are merely manipulative tools.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Determinism entails that given identical past states and laws, only one future is possible, eliminating genuine alternative possibilities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Our deepest intuition about freedom is that we are genuine agents whose choices originate from us, not mere links in causal chains.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.