Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Genuine perfection requires the capacity for self-determination, which al-Farabi's necessitarian First Being structurally cannot possess.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Perfection may consist in necessary immutable goodness rather than contingent choice; necessity could entail rather than negate perfection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Self-determination needn't mean libertarian free will; acting necessarily according to one's perfect rational nature constitutes genuine autonomy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates self-determination with indeterminism; a being could determine itself through its essential nature necessarily.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Self-determination requires the ability to act otherwise than one does; necessitarian beings cannot act otherwise by definition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Perfection intuitively includes authorship of one's own nature; a being whose essence and acts are necessitated lacks this authorship.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If a being's actions flow necessarily from its nature, it is determined by that nature rather than determining itself freely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.