Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Geroch's 1977 definition of hole freeness is too strong t... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Geroch's 1977 definition of hole freeness is too strong to serve as the appropriate condition.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Krasnikov showed that Minkowski spacetime fails to satisfy Geroch's 1977 definition of hole freeness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Minkowski spacetime is the standard well-behaved flat spacetime that any adequate definition should accommodate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Related

    Krasnikov showed that Minkowski spacetime fails to satisfy Geroch's 1977 definit...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Minkowski spacetime is the standard well-behaved flat spacetime that any adequat...

    Similar

    Krasnikov showed that Minkowski spacetime fails to satisfy Geroch's 19...83%Maximality does not rule out all spacetimes that lack hole freeness in...78%Maximality alone does not guarantee hole freeness in the sense require...75%Einstein's hole argument, which was the basis for this belief, is wron...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: time-machine
    View source passageHide passage
    The would-be time machine operator need not capitulate in the face of Krasnikov’s theorem. Recall that the main difficulty in specifying the conditions for the successful operation of Thornian time machines traces to the fact that the standard form of causal determinism does not apply to the production of CTCs. But causal determinism can fail for reasons that have nothing to do with CTCs or other acausal features of relativistic spacetimes, and it seems only fair to ensure that these modes of fa
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit