Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Gettier-style cases show that true belief can fail to constitute knowledge, so the converse—false belief blocking knowledge—is not the sole epistemic concern.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Gettier cases show JTB is incomplete, but this doesn't prove falsity is not 'the sole concern'—truth remains necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim conflates 'JTB is insufficient' with 'falsity isn't our primary epistemic concern,' which are different theses.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Epistemic systems can require both truth and additional conditions (like causal connection) without abandoning truth's centrality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Gettier cases demonstrate justified true belief lacking knowledge (e.g., Smith's ten coins case), proving JTB insufficient.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If truth alone were the sole epistemic concern, we'd accept lucky guesses as knowledge when true, but we intuitively don't.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The proper function of knowledge-attribution is to identify reliable cognitive achievement, which requires more than truth.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.