Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Gilbert Ryle's distinction between 'knowing that' and 'kn... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Knowledge requires truth.

    Gilbert Ryle's distinction between 'knowing that' and 'knowing how' shows procedural knowledge operates independently of propositional truth conditions.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.A person can skillfully ride a bicycle without being able to articulate the physics principles governing balance and motion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Procedural knowledge exhibits success conditions (performing well) distinct from propositional truth conditions (accurate beliefs).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Brain damage can selectively impair propositional knowledge while leaving procedural skills intact, suggesting independent cognitive systems.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Implicit knowledge of rules (e.g., grammar) still involves propositional content, just unconscious rather than independent of truth conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Executing a procedure requires at least minimal true beliefs about what one is doing, making complete independence from propositional truth impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Ryle conflated epistemic independence from conscious articulation with independence from propositional truth conditions themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked
    Knowledge requires truth.

    Related

    A person can skillfully ride a bicycle without being able to articulate the phys...Brain damage can selectively impair propositional knowledge while leaving proced...Executing a procedure requires at least minimal true beliefs about what one is d...Implicit knowledge of rules (e.g., grammar) still involves propositional content...
    +3 moreShow less
    Knowledge requires truth.Procedural knowledge exhibits success conditions (performing well) distinct from...Ryle conflated epistemic independence from conscious articulation with independe...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit