Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Given presentism, everything exists at the present time.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Abstract objects such as numbers and propositions exist but are not located at any time, including the present.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If some existents are temporally unlocated, then 'exists at the present time' does not follow from 'exists' alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
On possibilist ontologies (Meinong, Lewis), merely possible objects exist in some sense without being present actuals.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Presentism's quantifier 'everything exists' must be restricted to concrete actuals, making P2 question-begging against the possibilist.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Given presentism, if something exists, then it exists at the present time.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Everything exists.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.