Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Given presentism, if something exists, then it exists at the present time.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Bigelow and others argue that the past is real insofar as truths about it are made true by present-tensed facts about haecceities or essences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If past entities ground present truths without themselves existing now, existence cannot be restricted to the present moment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
This Lucretianism shows presentism conflates ontological grounding with temporal location.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Abstract objects like numbers and propositions exist without existing at any time, including the present.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If atemporal entities exist, then existence cannot be equivalent to existence-at-the-present-time.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
Presentists should say that existing at the present time just is existing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.