Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    God has personal parts (the persons of the Trinity) — Carmelics
    Home/Trinity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→God can be considered 'personal' even if God is not identical to any personal being

    God has personal parts (the persons of the Trinity)

    Trinity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Trinity

    Related

    God can be considered 'personal' even if God is not identical to any personal be...Having personal parts is sufficient for something to be considered 'personal'On Trinity monotheism, God is not identical to any single personal being

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Trinity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Having personal parts is sufficient for something to be considered 'pe...83%God can be considered 'personal' even if God is not identical to any p...78%As a literal self, personal pronouns may be literally used of God.74%Social entities may have intentions because their parts (i.e. various ...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: trinity
    View source passageHide passage
    Craig replies to Howard-Snyder’s objection to the Cerberus analogy that the claim that it represents three dogs is “astonishing”, as we all speak of two headed snakes, turtles and such (Craig 2003, 102). While on Trinity monotheism God isn’t identical to any personal being, it doesn’t follow that God isn’t “personal”. He is personal in the sense of having personal parts. Further, the view that God isn’t a self

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective