Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    God, in His love, would not allow someone to make a decis... — Carmelics
    Home/Universalism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    God, in His love, would not allow someone to make a decision that would cause irreparable harm

    Universalism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Universalism

    Similar

    If the above is true, then choosing Hell would cause irreparable harm ...85%Choosing Hell would cause irreparable harm to those that love the indi...84%God would not allow people in Heaven to suffer irreparable harm82%If God... harm, then God would stop anyone who had the intention to ch...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Universalism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    81%

    Source

    Mindmap

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Qualifier
    some
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Notes

    <html> <head> </head> <body> <p> The whole "in His love" bit is a qualifier of emphasis: basically, it has nothing to do with the argument itself, but calls attention to an aspect of whatever it is referring to (in this case, it is referring to God) in order to help defend it. In other words, for the sake of a uniform and more structured argument, such a phrase should be taken out and made into a supporting argument. In this case, something like: </p> <p> </p> <p> God loves His creation </p> <p> If God loves His creation, He would want good for them </p> <p> If God wants good for His creation, He would not allow one of them to make a decision that would cause irreparable harm </p> <p> </p> <p> Or something like that: the "if-thens" could be cleaned up and restructured, too. </p> </body> </html>

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective