Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    God is discovered to be simple and dependent on no cause ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→God's existence can be established indirectly by tracing the causal chains of all other beings back to a single first cause.

    God is discovered to be simple and dependent on no cause through this process.

    Divine AttributesProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesProof of definition segments

    Connections

    2 topics

    Natural Theology3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Causation
    2 linked

    Related

    All such causal chains lead ultimately to a single first cause.God's existence can be established indirectly by tracing the causal chains of al...God, as the first cause, enters into the fully spelled-out quiddities of everyth...In analyzing other beings and seeking their causal definitions, we trace them st...

    Similar

    God is dependent on no cause.87%A simple cause has one and only one simple effect.81%A simple cause can have only one simple effect.81%The First is simple, and its simplicity constrains the only possible w...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: al-farabi-metaphysics
    View source passageHide passage
    Fârâbî takes this result as indicating that dialectic and demonstrative science give different meanings, not only to the “what is X?” question and thus to quiddity (dialectic seeking a nominal definition, science a causal definition), but also to the “whether X is” question and thus to existence. So he says that, as in dialectic the two-place investigation “whether X is Y” is only concerned with the copula (not with whether it is essential predication), so in dialectic the one-place investigatio

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective