Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that God is the appropriate witness to invoke in an oath
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Invoking God as witness presupposes God's existence, making oaths epistemically circular for those who lack justified theistic belief.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An oath's binding force depends on the swearer's genuine belief in the witness, so a contested witness yields no additional normative traction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Kant argued in the Metaphysics of Morals that swearing by God treats the divine as a juridical instrument, violating the respect owed to God.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If invoking God instrumentally for human legal ends is morally impermissible, then God cannot be the appropriate witness without moral contradiction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
God cannot lie
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Nothing is hidden from God
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A divine witness overcomes both deficiencies of human witnesses: untruthfulness and lack of knowledge
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.