Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that God's atemporal eternal 'now' (Boethius's nunc stans) contains all temporal events as simultaneously present, making all truths eternally accessible.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Atemporal simultaneity is conceptually incoherent—'present' presupposes temporal flow; without time, simultaneity becomes meaningless.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If all events are eternally present to God, the distinction between past, present, and future collapses, making change and causation unintelligible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Knowing a future event as eternally present appears functionally identical to determining it, reintroducing the fatalism problem the model claims to solve.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.An atemporal perspective resolves logical contradictions between divine omniscience and human free will by placing God outside temporal sequence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God exists necessarily and eternally, His knowledge must transcend temporal limitations that bind finite creatures to sequential experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The nunc stans model explains how future contingents can be genuinely known without being causally determined by prior events.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.