Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that God's activity as first cause is actually the cause of our freedom.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
A will determined in its very act of willing by an external cause—even one aligned with its nature—lacks the sourcehood required for genuine freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Compatibilist redefinitions of freedom as 'acting according to one's nature' cannot account for the agent's ability to be the ultimate originator of her own acts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Kant's autonomy condition requires that the will legislate for itself, a condition violated if God is the primary cause of each free act.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The claim that divine causation causes freedom commits a category error: causation produces effects, but freedom is the absence of a certain kind of causal determination.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Rowe's principle holds that an omnipotent being who actualizes every free choice renders the agent's contribution causally redundant, defeating the concept of agent causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
God moves us in accordance with our voluntary nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.