Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Goodman's symbol theory establishes that pictorial representation is conventional, so painting can directly denote actions as readily as bodies.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Actions require temporal extension and change, while bodies are static; paintings capture single moments, making action-denotation fundamentally different from object-denotation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We recognize depicted bodies through morphological similarity; we infer actions through narrative convention and contextual cues—asymmetrical epistemic processes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Goodman's conventionalism about symbols doesn't entail all conventional systems have equal denotative capacity across all types of content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Symbol systems like language denote through convention; if depiction is symbolic rather than natural, painting operates similarly to linguistic denotation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Viewers trained in artistic conventions recognize depicted actions (running, gesturing) as readily as they identify depicted objects, showing conventional denotation works.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Both bodies and actions require interpretive frameworks to be recognized; neither denotes naturally, making them symmetrical in their dependence on convention.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.