Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Grammatically correct sentences require conventional word... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Buddha's use of conventional language does not commit the Buddha to accepting the existence of selves or causally arising phenomena.

    Grammatically correct sentences require conventional words such as 'I', 'you', and 'self'.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Personal Identity2 linkedTruth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Grammatical correctness does not entail that the words used in sentences have re...The Buddha's insight was that there is no self, yet the Buddha used conventional...The Buddha's use of conventional language does not commit the Buddha to acceptin...

    Similar

    The sentence 'The word I is a word each of us uses in speaking of hims...81%The subject 'I' refers to the self78%The indirect reflexive pronoun 'himself' cannot be used to explain the...76%Therefore, 'Superman' and 'Clark Kent' differ in sense.74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: madhyamaka
    View source passageHide passage
    After showing that there cannot be any intelligible account of the arising of phenomena, Candrakīrti acknowledges that in everyday experience we encounter phenomena coming into being all the time. This leads to a discussion of the two truths. The ultimate truth—that is, truth concerning the highest goal—is that phenomena do not come into being; the conventional transactional truth, on the other hand, is that things do come into being and that their arising is conditioned. This conventional truth

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective