Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Greedies are not viable without Modests in the population.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Greedies can sustain themselves through repeated exploitation of new entrants or naive agents who have not yet learned to defect.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Evolutionary game theory (Maynard Smith) shows populations can cycle through strategies without any single type requiring another for viability.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
In sufficiently large or heterogeneous populations, Greedies can persist by exploiting coordination failures among non-Greedy agents, not Modests specifically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Skyrms' 'Evolution of the Social Contract' demonstrates that local interaction structures can sustain greedy strategies independently of Modest presence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
Greedies depend on having Modests around in order to be viable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42