Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Grice's Cooperative Principle already predicts systematic, predictable inferences without positing them as encoded linguistic knowledge.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Many conventional implicatures (e.g., 'but' vs 'and') show systematic differences that Grice's maxims alone cannot differentiate or predict.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Children and non-native speakers often fail to derive obvious Gricean implicatures despite possessing general reasoning abilities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The speed and automaticity of pragmatic inference suggests encoded knowledge rather than on-the-fly derivation from cooperative principles.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Grice's maxims explain implicatures through rational communication principles alone, without requiring stored linguistic rules.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Speakers successfully coordinate inferences across novel contexts, suggesting derivation from general reasoning rather than memorized meanings.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The Cooperative Principle parsimoniously unifies diverse inference types under single explanatory framework, reducing theoretical entities needed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.