Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Grounding theorists like Kit Fine distinguish metaphysical explanation from mere modal covariation, arguing that identity claims are too weak to explain supervenience directionality.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Identity claims establish conceptual priority: if water just is H2O, explaining water's liquidity via H2O's bonds suffices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Grounding's supposed directional asymmetry may itself require modal and identity facts to be determinate; it adds no new explanatory layer.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Supervenience directionality can be explained by causal history and physical composition without invoking controversial grounding relations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Modal covariation alone cannot distinguish whether A grounds B or B grounds A, since both directions preserve necessary covariation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Identity statements (like 'water is H2O') describe what things are, not why one property depends on another's obtaining.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Explanatory directionality requires asymmetry; grounding provides this asymmetry where pure modality cannot.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.