Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Grumpy Socrates does not exist in possible worlds where S... — Carmelics
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Socrates is not identical with grumpy Socrates.

    Grumpy Socrates does not exist in possible worlds where Socrates has a sunny and genial disposition.

    Modality & PossibilityPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal IdentityModality & Possibility

    Related

    If two things differ with respect to existence across possible worlds, they are ...Socrates does exist in those possible worlds.Socrates is not identical with grumpy Socrates.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Personal Identity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    We cannot conceive of a possible world in which, given CT, SK is true.79%There are possible worlds in which Bush's individual essence exists bu...78%There is a possible world in which O and S differ78%Under Gap, in worlds where Bergoglio does not exist, '¬Hb' (Bergoglio ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: truth-identity
    View source passageHide passage
    Note, first, that this problem, if it is a problem, has nothing especially to do with the identity theory of truth or with facts. It seems to arise already for true propositions and propositions taken simpliciter before ever we get to the topic of facts. That is, one might think that the proposition that Socrates is wise is identical with the true proposition that Socrates is wise (assuming, as we are doing, that this proposition is true); but we then face the objection that the proposition take

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective