Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Guidance control does not require access to alternatives;... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The sort of control necessarily associated with moral responsibility for action is guidance control, not regulative control.

    Guidance control does not require access to alternatives; it is manifested when an agent guides her behavior in a particular direction, regardless of whether it was open to her to guide her behavior in a different direction.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Key Terms

    Access to alternatives(as used in free will debates)
    The ability or opportunity to have chosen to do something different from what you actually did.
    agent(Economics terminology applied to medical ethics)
    The party in a principal-agent relationship who is instructed to produce the good or service on the principal's behalf — in the medical context, the doctor
    guidance control(Fischer's distinction, invoked by Frankfurt)
    The form of control concerning what an agent does do and her actual basis for doing it; the freedom pertinent to moral responsibility on Frankfurt's view.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Frankfurt cases show that access to behavioral alternatives is not necessary for...Regulative control involves the dual power to freely do some act A and the power...The sort of control necessarily associated with moral responsibility for action ...

    Similar

    An agent exhibits guidance control when the mechanism that issues in t...80%An action is free when the agent has a powerful desire to perform it, ...80%A satisfactory theory of agency must explain what an agent's exercise ...79%The desire to be a self-governing agent plays a causal role even when ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-responsibility
    View source passageHide passage
    Fischer and Ravizza begin with a distinction between regulative control and guidance control. Regulative control involves the possession of a dual power: “the power freely to do some act A, and the power freely to do something else instead” (1998: 31). Guidance control, on the other hand, does not require access to alternatives: it is manifested when an agent guides her behavior in a particular direction (and regardless of whether it was open to her to guide her behavior in a different direction). Since Fischer and Ravizza take Frankfurt cases (§1) to show that access to behavioral alternati...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective