Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hare holds that moral properties weakly supervene on nonm... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Davidson and Hare owe an explanation for why mental and moral properties weakly supervene on physical and nonmoral properties respectively, without strong supervenience also holding

    Hare holds that moral properties weakly supervene on nonmoral properties

    Modality & PossibilityMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityModality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Davidson and Hare owe an explanation for why mental and moral properties weakly ...Davidson holds that mental properties weakly supervene on physical propertiesIt is not clear why mental properties would weakly supervene on physical propert...The analogous question holds for moral properties and nonmoral properties

    Similar

    Davidson and Hare owe an explanation for why mental and moral properti...89%The analogous question holds for moral properties and nonmoral propert...89%Moral properties, under moral naturalism, are identical to or constitu...85%There must be moral principles connecting moral properties to non-mora...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: supervenience
    View source passageHide passage
    In contrast, it is by no means clear why mental properties would weakly supervene on physical properties without strongly supervening on them; and the analogous question arises for moral properties and nonmoral properties. Davidson and Hare owe us an explanation of why mental and moral properties weakly supervene, respectively, on physical and nonmoral ones—and it must be an explanation that does not entail that strong supervenience holds as well. Simon Blackburn’s well-known argument against mo

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective