Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Harmony in Leibniz's system is ontologically prior to knowledge, existing independently in the pre-established order of monads.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Harmony is identified through comparing perceptions; without knowledge or consciousness, 'harmony' has no discernible meaning or content.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Leibniz defines harmony via phenomenal agreement between monads' perceptions—a relational property seemingly dependent on relata's awareness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If harmony exists independent of all knowledge, we cannot coherently distinguish it from non-harmony or justify calling it 'harmony.'
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
God's omniscience requires all truths, including harmonious relations, to exist necessarily in divine intellect before creation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Monads' perceptions perfectly mirror the universe without causal interaction, proving harmony precedes and grounds all knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If harmony depended on knowledge, infinite regress would arise: knowledge of what? Knowledge requires prior harmonious structure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.