Harsanyi's utility aggregation framework holds that interpersonal utility comparisons can be normalized so that any two-player game with opposed interests is representable as zero-sum under an appropriate cardinal rescaling.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Two-player game(as the type of scenario the framework applies to)
A situation where exactly two people are making decisions that affect each other's outcomes.
Utility aggregation(as the main framework being described)
A method for combining and comparing the well-being or satisfaction of multiple people to make fair decisions.
zero-sum game(The fugitive-pursuer scenario is characterized as zero-sum: the pursuer's probability of catching equals 1 minus the fugitive's probability of escaping.)
A game in which one player's gain is exactly equal to the other player's loss, so the sum of payoffs is constant.