Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Harsanyi's utility aggregation framework holds that inter... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The pursuer-fugitive game is not strictly competitive when the utility functions reflect the players' actual preferences about outcomes

    Harsanyi's utility aggregation framework holds that interpersonal utility comparisons can be normalized so that any two-player game with opposed interests is representable as zero-sum under an appropriate cardinal rescaling.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Cardinal rescaling(as the mathematical technique that makes the conversion possible)
    Adjusting numerical measurements of something (like happiness scores) by multiplying or stretching them so they can be fairly compared.
    Harsanyi(game theory and decision-making under uncertainty)
    John Harsanyi was a Hungarian-American economist and philosopher who developed a mathematical framework for understanding how people make decisions when they don't have complete information about others' beliefs or preferences.
    Interpersonal utility comparisons(Distinguished into comparisons of levels vs. differences in the literature)
    Comparisons of utility levels or utility differences across distinct individuals, used to ground distributive evaluations such as egalitarianism and utilitarianism.
    Opposed interests(as the condition describing conflict between players)
    When two people want different things or benefit from opposite outcomes.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Two-player game(as the type of scenario the framework applies to)
    A situation where exactly two people are making decisions that affect each other's outcomes.
    Utility aggregation(as the main framework being described)
    A method for combining and comparing the well-being or satisfaction of multiple people to make fair decisions.
    zero-sum game(The fugitive-pursuer scenario is characterized as zero-sum: the pursuer's probability of catching equals 1 minus the fugitive's probability of escaping.)
    A game in which one player's gain is exactly equal to the other player's loss, so the sum of payoffs is constant.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    The pursuer-fugitive game is not strictly competitive when the utility functions...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective