Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Having atomic number 79 is necessarily a necessary condition for being gold, but not a sufficient condition for being gold.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.On Putnam's own causal-historical account, 'gold' rigidly designates the actual stuff in our environment, not any single intrinsic property like atomic number.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the reference of 'gold' is fixed by causal chains to samples rather than to atomic number 79, then atomic number 79 is a discovered co-extensional truth, not a metaphysically prior necessary condition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, the modal status of atomic number 79 as a necessary condition depends on a descriptivist reading of kind terms that Putnam's framework explicitly rejects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Dupré's promiscuous realism holds that natural kind membership is context-dependent and that no single property carves nature at its unique joints.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If multiple equally legitimate classificatory schemes exist—metallurgical, functional, isotopic—then atomic number 79 may be necessary only relative to one scheme, not absolutely necessary across all valid schemes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A condition that is necessary only relative to a particular classificatory interest cannot bear the weight of mind-independent metaphysical necessity the claim requires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Something superficially like gold in appearance but lacking atomic number 79 would not be gold.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a property must be present for a thing to belong to a natural kind, that property is a necessary condition for membership in that kind.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The necessity of a condition does not entail its sufficiency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.