Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that HD satisfies the individual account only under a ceteris paribus clause that smuggles in background conditions the genetic account cannot itself specify.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
HD's ceteris paribus clause conceals rather than resolves what makes beliefs knowledge, leaving the core question unanswered.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The genetic account can independently specify origin conditions (proper causal chains); HD cannot match this specificity without circularity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Smuggling background conditions into ceteris paribus clauses violates explanatory honesty required for genuine philosophical accounts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
All accounts of knowledge require background assumptions; HD's ceteris paribus clause is no worse than others' implicit conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The genetic account itself relies on unspecified background conditions about proper causal origins, making mutual dependence on context.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If HD cannot specify backgrounds, neither can competing accounts; the objection proves too much to isolate HD's problem.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.