Hegel argues in the Science of Logic that Kant's sharp division between thought and being is itself incoherent, since being that is wholly external to thought is an empty abstraction.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Hegel(as the main philosopher referenced in this statement): Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a German philosopher (1770-1831) who argued that reality and human thought develop through a process of contradiction and resolution, constantly evolving toward greater understanding.
Incoherent(describing whether moral responsibility can exist): Logically impossible or contradictory; something that cannot make sense or cannot exist at the same time as something else.
Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics): Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
Science of Logic(as the specific text being discussed): Hegel's major work that describes how abstract concepts and categories develop and relate to each other, serving as the foundation for understanding reality itself.

Based on where you are in your exploration