Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Hegel argues that Kant's prohibition on theoretical knowl... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Reason's transcendental ideas of the unconditioned can never provide theoretical knowledge of any object

    Hegel argues that Kant's prohibition on theoretical knowledge of the unconditioned itself presupposes a determinate concept of what lies beyond conceptual reach.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant defines the noumenon negatively as 'that which cannot be known through concepts,' which is itself a determinate conceptual characterization.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Any limit-claim (like 'X is beyond knowledge') requires understanding what lies on the other side, implying the very conceptual grasp it denies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel's critique reveals an internal contradiction in Kant's critical philosophy that undermines its foundational distinction between phenomena and noumena.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Distinguishing between 'X exists' and 'X has determinate properties knowable to us' preserves Kant's position without the alleged contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Negative characterization ('not-knowable') differs logically from positive conceptual knowledge and doesn't presuppose determinate content about the thing itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel conflates epistemic limits with metaphysical impossibility, assuming any reference to the unconditioned must ground positive conceptual knowledge of it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Any limit-claim (like 'X is beyond knowledge') requires understanding what lies ...Distinguishing between 'X exists' and 'X has determinate properties knowable to ...Hegel conflates epistemic limits with metaphysical impossibility, assuming any r...Hegel's critique reveals an internal contradiction in Kant's critical philosophy...
    +3 moreShow less
    Kant defines the noumenon negatively as 'that which cannot be known through conc...Negative characterization ('not-knowable') differs logically from positive conce...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Reason's transcendental ideas of the unconditioned can never provide theoretical...